Measuring The Cost Of Organizational Conflict, continued


Factor 4: Restructuring

Often, design of workflow is altered in an attempt to reduce the amount of interaction required between employees in conflict.

Unfortunately, the restructured work is usually less efficient than the original design, which would have been satisfactory if the conflicting employees had been able to work together. As with Factor 2 above, it is impossible to precisely calculate the resulting inefficiency, but your subjective assessment will give a reasonable estimate.

Again, be sure to enter a conservative (low side) figure on your worksheet. Guideline: 10% of the combined salaries of employees whose relationship was restructured for the time the restructuring is in effect.

Example: Estimate $8000 if four employees, each of whom is paid $40,000 annually, were reassigned to different task groups for a six month period, i.e., (($40,000 X 4)/10)/2).

Rationale: The financial value of employees (i.e., "human resources") to an employer for performing specified work is, by definition, roughly equivalent to their salaries. If that work must later be restructured to control interpersonal conflict, the redesigned work relationship is probably not the most efficient allocation of the human resources.

Factor 5: Sabotage/theft/damage

Studies reveal a direct correlation between prevalence of employee conflict and the amount of damage and theft of inventory and equipment. And, covert sabotage of work processes and of management´s efforts usually occurs when employees are angry at their employer.

Much of the cost incurred by this factor is hidden from management´s view, excused as "accidental" or "inadvertent" errors. This cost is almost certainly greater than you may realize. Again, enter a conservative figure on the worksheet. Guideline: 10% of the acquisition cost of equipment, tools, and supplies that conflicted employees use in performing their jobs.

Example: $2500, if an operator of a $20,000 machine in a manufacturing environment is angry toward his/her supervisor ($2000 for careless operation and maintenance of the machine, plus $500 for unnecessary scrap and waste of raw materials).

Factor 6: Lowered job motivation

From time to time, most employees experience erosion of job motivation due to the stress of trying to get along with a "difficult person." As a baseline figure, use the productivity that would have occurred had no conflict occurred.

Then, estimate a percentage decline of that productivity. Multiply that percentage times the dollar value of the total compensation of the person(s) affected to derive a figure for Factor 6.

For example, let´s say that the productivity of three employees was eroded by 20% for a period of three months. Using figures similar to those above, the three employees´ total compensation was 3 X $60,000, or $180,000.

Since one-fourth of this amount ($45,000) was earned during the three month period, the conflict cost the organization $9000.

Factor 7: Lost work time

Absenteeism has been shown to correlate with job stress, especially the stress associated with anger toward co-workers. This stress, combined with disregard for how one´s absence impacts others, leads to employees´ choosing to take time off ­ sometimes excused as a "sick day."

And, medical science has determined that nearly every physical illness and injury, from viral infections to cancer to workplace accidents, are partially "psychogenic." That is, they are caused in part by psychological or emotional conditions. The portion of lost work time that has resulted from your targeted conflict is largely hidden from your direct view, with the possible exception of your own absences.

Still, you can arrive at an estimate by prorating daily or monthly compensation. Again, be sure to enter a conservative estimate on your worksheet. Guideline: 10% of annual salaries of employees in conflict.

Example: $18,000 if all six members of a department, each of whom is paid $25,000 annually, are in ongoing conflict with their supervisor, who is paid $30,000, throughout the year ($25,000 X 6) divided by 10 + $30,000 divided 10.

Factor 8: Health costs

As mentioned under Factor 7, illnesses and injuries requiring medical attention are partially psychogenic, and conflict contributes to their psychogenesis. Since the rate of claims affects the premium paid by an employer to its insurer, insurance is an indirect cost of workplace conflict.

Estimate the percentage of the psychogenic component of medical problems that have occurred while your targeted conflict has gone on, and multiply this percentage times the premium increase imposed by your organization´s insurer.

Admittedly, this psychogenic component is difficult to ascertain, and you may not be privy to the insurance costs of your employer. So, enter a conservative figure based on your knowledge of these matters. A shortcut is to enter 10% of the number you have entered for Factor 6, "lowered job motivation," since the stress that results in reduced productivity is also related to our physical health.


Back to Table of Contents Back to Tools Index Continue...


  Copyright 2003-2006 www.iBizResources.com